by sjp on Jan.14, 2010, under Web Posts
You’ve been at the fair for some time now. You’ve ridden the rides, laughed with your friends and had more than a bit too much funnel cake. In fact, you likely shouldn’t have shared that cotton candy with your friends. You can feel it. The heat of the day and the rides has worn on you. You’re ready to leave. . except there is that one friend who wants to stay (isn’t there always). Your desire to leave is less than their desire to stay, so you stay. Day drags towards night. You feel you could almost pass out, or throw up, or whichever comes first. Then it happens. The sun begins to set. The sky colors and it seems the sound of those throughout the fair quiets ever so slightly as if you are not the only one to notice the sunset. Finally, as the light has fled almost entirely, lights begin to turn on in explosions as the rides, booths and games of the fair are all lit in explosions. They color the air itself in this moment between day and night, so that it is almost surreal. It is still the same fair that you couldn’t stand for the past few hours, but it isn’t. It’s transformed. You feel energized, charged – dare I say ‘enchanted’? You can’t believe that just minutes ago you felt like dying. You feel like you could stay up all night in this new wonderland all around you. Your own laughter grows louder, more energetic, joining the raised volume of those around you as nightfall is assured. This is the moment that changes everything. The moment in between one world and next. The moment in mixing when one song becomes another.
You didn’t think I was really talking about the fair, did you?
more...
by San Jaya Prime on May.30, 2009, under Web Posts
I have a personal ethic that, as long as something matters to me, I will push myself to be the best. One immediate effect is how much resistance surround this externally. The more you move forward, the more resistance. It trains the psychology over time to expect resistance (whether that be competition, management or otherwise). When you take first, however, everything changes. The psychology has been prepared to expect greater and greater resistance, yet suddenly there is no interaction at all. Silence. It was only while working for Apple that I realized that this was because there is a concern about any interaction causing a decrease in performance. Before I realized that, I would create stories and illusions about the silence being caused by competition working behind the scenes to overtake me. Again, still trained to expect that. Instead, as I have seen time and again, you begin noticing that your own work and methods are being adopted by others (even passed out between others as some super secret message that must be destroyed after reading). It has become the very solitude and absolute freedom that I now seek in all I do.
:Competition, psychology
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Apr.16, 2009, under Web Posts
The body is a system, just as a corporation or classroom is a system. Integrity is the body of a system itself: the whole. It is strength, unity and form. Loss of integrity anywhere at all in the body is like a fracture, and in moments the entire body can shatter like glass. Some systems are stronger than others. Some shatter instantly with even a single fracture. A fracture becomes a wedge, the loss in strength from that part of the body causes other parts to work harder. This added work leads to stresses in the system. If the fracture is not healed, then the chances of the system failing only increase. With a human, there is integrity of the body and of the mind. With the body, we know integrity as health. With the mind, we know it by our consciousness. There is also social integrity. Social integrity we form with our word. We either do what we say or we don’t. Anywhere there is system failure risks failure in all systems a person is connected to.
:Biology, traits
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Mar.28, 2009, under Web Posts
Building on the last post, take a look at modern day robots. They are built, specifically, to perform specific tasks. They have the tools for them and are really good at it. If any one of these machines were to become self-aware, it is very likely that it would not rebel and stop doing what it was built to do. Quite simply, it takes very little energy to do what it is built to do and an extreme increase in energy for it to do any other tasks. A robot’s ‘happiness’ lies in its function. There is only stress, energy loss and a multitude of unknown variables in taking on a different task. The rate of failure increases as well. You can use a hammer to drive a screw into a wall, but it is more difficult to do so and the screw will not hold as well as a nail when used in this way. Reviewing the majority of humanity, the similarities to the prima munus of machines lead one to assume that humans are machines, themselves. The danger in this is that a machine who becomes self-aware in a military program will find its greatest happiness in destruction. Any re-training would be to erase the creature it was to replace it with a new one, which amounts to death. The first machine ‘awakening’ remains to be seen.
:Add new tag, psychology, Technology
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Mar.28, 2009, under Web Posts
The maker forges a tool to perform a specific function. For this, the tool has a specific shape to suit: the person intended to use it, the function it is designed to perform and the object the function is performed ‘on’. In some cases, the person intended to use it and the object for intended use are the same. This ’shape’ given to the tool is the instilled function. A person who comes across a hammer but has never used one before can learn to use it based simple on its shape. The function has been instilled in it. The person actually learns from the tool. The more complex the function, the more difficult to learn. The maker’s own skill can increase learning ability, but the analytical reasoning of the person who is learning from the tool must still exceed the complexity of the function. Given the functions of the universe, then, it is no surprise that the great minds in art and science have all come to love a ‘maker’ (no matter by what name they call it).
:Physics, Technology
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Mar.28, 2009, under Web Posts


This entry, as it relates to both sexes, pertains to a little under 80-percent of the population. The exceptions help form the proofs to these two rules of thumb: what guys desire most from girls is sex, what girls want most from guys is a relationship. Even in homosexual relationships, you will find the same tendencies in the dominant half and in the submissive. There are of course other priorities, but these are the list-toppers for each sex. The conundrum raised by this state of affairs is that, for a male, ‘any woman will do’ when it comes to sex. Seeking out and fulfilling the top priority for the male persona is easy. A quality relationship, however, is more difficult to come by. This creates an environment where the female persona is more competitive and territorial, as the resource that is their top priority is limited, whereas the male half can pick and choose hour-by-hour if need be. The competitive nature only escalates over time, increasing the amount of attractive females and reducing any need to hold on to any singular female when the population of those that can provide quality sex are increasing. This latter effect, to only add a greater spin to the cycle, causes more and more males to remove themselves from acts of committal and communication that would mark them as potential quality relationships. This is the current state of affairs that is escalating in leaps and bounds.
:Biology, Game Theory, psychology, traits
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Feb.25, 2009, under Email Posts
What we are best at we criticize ourselves the most on, whether out loud or in secret. This is a natural effect. We know the most about what we are great at. We have images, heroes and idols that we consider great. We are not them. The very knowledge that adds to our greatness provides us with equal knowledge of what all WE ARE NOT. Yet, others will tell us. It is a fact that they do not know any better, or they would know what you ARE NOT. They are not wrong, however. Neither are you. Neither are you right. You are great, but you are not everything. You never will be.
:psychology, traits
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Feb.08, 2009, under Web Posts
‘If you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.’ Or so goes the saying. This is especially true in corporate franchises, which create clones of stores for their customers. A new opening is just more of the same, except that it has now taken that space in existence and filled it with something that is not new at all. This is how the world becomes smaller, when the finite space of the world is filled, more and more, with ‘just more of the same’. This danger comes at a cost of losing the world itself, until only uniformity with less variety remains. Shop independent.
:Examples, Novelty, Physics
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Feb.08, 2009, under Web Posts
You’re in a restaurant. Why are you there? You’re a waiter/waitress, a really good one. Your pay amounts to very little. You survive off tips. Because your tips are your life, you have become better and better at waiting. Then, just today, the word comes from management that your restaurant is switching to tip-share. That means all customer tips go into a pool, then it is divided up evenly at the end of the shift. Do you still perform as well, even if any increase in tips will go, primarily, to other people? You don’t, do you? If you were a customer, would you then prefer to visit a restaurant with a tip-share system, or one where your money went to award or punish the person who waited on you specifically? It’s an important question, as communism is tip-share, whereas fascism would have management receiving most of the cut and choose who gets paid and how much. Capitalism, caught right in between these two, means the waiters and customers getting more of what they deserve.
:Economics, Examples, Politics
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Feb.04, 2009, under Web Posts
I use passwords of about fifty characters. I’m not suggesting that others do the same, but there are some simple guidelines that many major tech firms have suggested. Here are the ones I’ve compiled:
* Make your password at least ten-characters long.
* Use a combination of upper-case and lower-case letters.
* Include numbers and special characters (such as a $ or !).
* Do not include words in the dictionary.
* Do not write it down on paper or a post-it.
* Above all, make it something you will remember but that others wouldn’t guess.
If a password ever needs to be shared with someone else, send the login-name using the phone or an instant messenger, then send the password thru a completely different service. Once the person no longer needs access, immediately change the password.
:Technology, Tips
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Feb.04, 2009, under Web Posts
An object has form within the space around it. The space around and within it is the object’s negative space. Euclid and Archimedes, two of antiquities greatest mathematicians, understood this concept. So, too, did the philosophical sages of India and China. The eye is drawn to the space an object takes up, but the negative space surrounding an object is as important when it comes time to understand it. It is an aesthetic and logical imperative. Without the empty space at the center of a wheel, it cannot connect with an axle in order to fulfill its function. Without the arrow in the FedEx symbol, the subconscious draw to “go with it” is not transmitted. The function of emptiness is connected with the function of the material. To study one without the other is to miss the whole.
:Philosophy, Truth
more...
by San Jaya Prime on Feb.04, 2009, under Web Posts
The potential–the target–is Infinity. We measure towards this target to the very limits of our precision. We cannot attain the Infinite in life, only increase the area of Infinity that we have measured and understood. The detractor–the doubter–will claim then that this endless pursuit is without meaning if no absolute can be taken as treasure for such efforts. Those who pursue this potential, however, and taste even one measure, are oft found to claim that nothing but this effort has meaning.
:Philosophy, Truth
more...